DeFT Response™ technology allows physicians to customize rescue therapy to each patient’s unique cardiac physiology and changing condition.
DeFT Response technology preserved a 10 J safety margin for 100% of the Abbott patients.
17% of the fixed-tilt group of patients with competitive devices had compromised the 10 J safety margin.
Group A: Adjustable Abbott | Group B: Fixed-tilt Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
NICM | ICM | NICM | ICM | |
14 J | — | 20 (59%) | — | 24 (34%) |
21 J | 7 (20%) | 3 (9%) | 17 (24%) | 8 (11%) |
25 J | 1 (3%) | 3 (9%) | 7 (10%) | 3 (4%) |
31 J | 0 | 0 | 6 (8%) | 4 (6%) |
35 J | 0 | 0 | 2 (3%) | 0 |
Method: Analysis of DFT levels for 105 patients implanted with a single coil lead between Aug 2007 and Aug 2010.
DFT Testing: VF induced by synchronized T-wave shock or direct current pulse. If initial shock failed, second shock delivered at highest energy within 10 J safety margin of device. If unsuccessful, a subcutaneous coil implanted and DFT test repeated. Note: the RV-coil was specifically programmed as an anode in all devices.
*Applies to single coil systems.
MAT-2009635 v2.0
Stay Connected