AVEIR AR Atrial
Leadless Pacemaker

World’s First and Only Atrial Leadless Pacemaker

AVEIR Leadless Pacemakers

MAT-2403640 v2.0 | Item approved for U.S. use only. ©2025 Abbott. All Rights Reserved.

Atrial Pacing: Mimicking the Heart's Natural Rhythm for SSS Patients

Atrial pacing replicates the heart's natural conduction system by stimulating the atrium, ensuring coordinated heart chamber contraction through the AV node and His-Purkinje system. The AVEIR AR Atrial Leadless Pacemaker, a first-of-its-kind technology from Abbott, offers a safe, effective, upgradeable solution for patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and normal AV intraventricular conduction systems. Key benefits include:

  • Preserving physiological AV conduction for natural heart rhythms
  • Reduced risks of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy1-4

Watch the Video

Discover the Clinical Evidence

Presented by Dr. Devi Nair of St. Bernards Medical Center & Arrhythmia Research Group, this initial real-world experience data on the helix-fixation for the AVEIR AR LP demonstrated safe and effective implantation with 100% success, clinically viable electrical metrics, and no acute complications. This presentation introduces all the components while illustrating the dual helix design for atrial therapy. 

AVEIR AR Atrial LP Clinical Outcomes5

95.2% Effective 

88%

90.3% Safe

92.5%

ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE SUCCESS RATE5 in early clinical evidence patients with acceptable atrial device capture threshold and sensing amplitude.*

FREEDOM FROM COMPLICATIONS.5 The inclusion of arrhythmias as a safety endpoint increased the overall incidence of complications compared with other studies of leadless pacemakers, which excluded arrhythmias from the endpoint.

*Atrial device capture threshold of ≤3.0V@04ms and ≥0.5mV at 3 month visit.

Resources

Recent Blogs

View AVEIR AR Atrial LP in Action

Reexamine the Therapy Choice for SND Patients (2024)

Presentation at Heart Rhythm 2024 by Monica Lo, MD, FHRS, FACC 

Sinus Node Dysfunction Case Studies

Minimizing for Maximum Benefit: An Illustrative Case-Series of Atrial Only Leadless Pacing

Upgradeable System6

Patient therapy can be tailored by implanting an atrial device alone, or both atrial and ventricular devices together for dual chamber support. The option to upgrade over time allows you to meet your patient’s needs today and adapt to common disease progression later.


Treatment Option 1: Start with the Atrial Device. 

Treat atrial arrhythmia and sinus node dysfunction today.

AVEIR AR in heart

Add a ventricular device for heart block later.

AVEIR DR in heart

i2i™ communication is enabled.

i2i symbol

Activate dual chamber pacing therapy DDD(R) via i2i communication.

AVEIR DR in heart

Treatment Option 2: Tailored Therapy with AAI(R)+VVI Pacing Mode.**

  • Up to 70% increase in atrial device longevity versus DDD(R)

Start with a dual chamber device.

AVEIR VR in heart

Turn off Beat-to-Beat communications to enable independent single chamber pacing for each device.

i2i symbol

Treat SND patients today with an option of back-up ventricular pacing in the case of rare intermittent AV block.

AVEIR DR in heart

**Note: AAI(R)+VVI mode should not be used in patients without intact AV node conduction or with chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

Partnering with You to Personalize Care

Sign up to hear about our technology, education opportunities, and more.

Read the Latest Blog Article

Stay up to date with recent news, product highlights, and case studies.

REFERENCES

***For additional information about specific MR Conditional, including warnings, precautions, adverse conditions to MRI scanning and potential adverse events, please refer to the MRI-Ready Leadless Systems Manual at medical.abbott/manuals or check our MRI-Ready resources at cardiovascular.abbott/mriready

 

  1. Kim WH, Joung B, Shim J, et al. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2010;51(6):832-837. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.832.
  2. Fored C, Granath F, Gadler F, et al. Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study. Europace. 2008;10(7):825-831. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun118
  3. Healey JS, Toff WD, Lamas GA, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with atrial-based pacing compared with ventricular pacing: meta-analysis of randomized trials, using individual patient data. Circulation. 2006;114(1):11-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.610303.
  4. Masumoto H, Ueda Y, Kato R, et al. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing. Europace. 2004;6(5):444-450. doi: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.05.003.
  5. Knops, Reinoud E., et al. “A Dual- Chamber Leadless Pacemaker.” New England Journal of Medicine (2023). DOI: 10.1056/ NEJMoa2300080.
  6. AVEIR DR FDA Approval
 Manuals & Resources

Manuals & Resources

Cardiovascular Products

Cardiovascular Products

Reimbursement & Coding

Reimbursement & Coding

MAT-2501546 v1.0